Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the mistaken reference to Clause 8 Part III in the affidavit of the Central Government should be treated as a reference to Clause 4.12(b) of the scheme of amalgamation, and whether the scheme should be drawn up accordingly.
Analysis: The affidavit contained an obvious error in referring to a non-existent Clause 8 Part III, although the intended reference was to Clause 4.12(b). The clarification ensured that the proposed amendment requiring compliance with Sections 14, 61 and 64 of the Companies Act, 2013 was read in the correct part of the scheme.
Outcome: The mistaken clause reference was corrected, the scheme was directed to be read as Clause 4.12(b), and the department was directed to draw up the scheme expeditiously.