https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292416 A mistaken reference in the Central Government's affidavit to a non-existent Clause 8 Part III was treated as an obvious error and corrected to Clause 4.12(b) of the amalgamation scheme. The clarification ensured that the proposed amendment, requiring compliance with Sections 14, 61 and 64 of the Companies Act, 2013, was read into the correct part of the scheme. The scheme was therefore directed to be drawn up on that corrected basis, and the department was asked to proceed expeditiously. en-us Tue, 30 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 22 Dec 2020 20:13:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292416 A mistaken reference in the Central Government's affidavit to a non-existent Clause 8 Part III was treated as an obvious error and corrected to Clause 4.12(b) of the amalgamation scheme. The clarification ensured that the proposed amendment, requiring compliance with Sections 14, 61 and 64 of the Companies Act, 2013, was read into the correct part of the scheme. The scheme was therefore directed to be drawn up on that corrected basis, and the department was asked to proceed expeditiously. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 30 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292416