Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2017 (4) TMI 1483 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal rules on revenue's deductions under Sections 10A and 92C(2), remands TP issues for fresh consideration. The Tribunal dismissed the revenue's grounds related to the deduction under Section 10A but allowed the revenue's grounds concerning the standard ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Tribunal rules on revenue's deductions under Sections 10A and 92C(2), remands TP issues for fresh consideration.

                          The Tribunal dismissed the revenue's grounds related to the deduction under Section 10A but allowed the revenue's grounds concerning the standard deduction under Section 92C(2). The Tribunal remanded the TP issues and the classification of interest income back to the CIT(A) for fresh consideration, instructing a detailed and reasoned examination of the matters. Both appeals were allowed for statistical purposes.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Deduction under Section 10A of the Income Tax Act.
                          2. Standard deduction of 5% under Section 92C(2) of the Income Tax Act.
                          3. Transfer Pricing (TP) issues related to the exclusion of comparable companies.
                          4. Classification of interest income as business income for deduction under Section 10A.

                          Detailed Analysis:

                          1. Deduction under Section 10A of the Income Tax Act:
                          The revenue challenged the CIT(A)'s decision to recompute the deduction allowable under Section 10A by reducing telecommunication expenses from both export turnover and total turnover. The CIT(A) held that the action of the AO in reducing telecommunication expenses only from export turnover and not from total turnover was unsustainable. This issue was settled by the jurisdictional High Court in Tata Elxsi Ltd., which held that if an amount is reduced from export turnover, it must also be reduced from total turnover. Therefore, the Tribunal dismissed the revenue's ground on this issue, affirming the CIT(A)'s order.

                          2. Standard deduction of 5% under Section 92C(2) of the Income Tax Act:
                          The revenue contested the CIT(A)'s decision to allow a standard deduction of 5% from the arithmetical mean of the profit margin of comparables while computing the arm's length price (ALP). The Tribunal referred to the judgment of the Bombay Bench in Bayer Crop Science Ltd. and the special bench decision in IHG IT Services (India) (P.) Ltd., which clarified that the benefit of the 5% tolerance margin was restricted to cases where the variation between the ALP and the transaction price does not exceed 5%. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the revenue's grounds on this issue, reversing the CIT(A)'s decision.

                          3. Transfer Pricing (TP) issues related to the exclusion of comparable companies:
                          The revenue challenged the CIT(A)'s exclusion of seven comparables selected by the TPO on the grounds of being super-profit companies. The Tribunal found the CIT(A)'s order to be cryptic and lacking in detailed reasoning. The Tribunal emphasized the need to examine the comparables based on functional similarity, related party transactions, and turnover filters as per Rule 10B(2) of the Income Tax Rules. The Tribunal remanded the matter back to the CIT(A) for a fresh determination, instructing a detailed examination of each company's profile.

                          4. Classification of interest income as business income for deduction under Section 10A:
                          The assessee argued that interest income from temporary deposits of surplus business funds should be considered as business income eligible for deduction under Section 10A. The Tribunal noted that the CIT(A) and TPO had not provided substantial reasoning for rejecting this claim. The Tribunal referred to its earlier decision in the assessee's case, which held that temporarily parked funds in FDs could be considered business income. However, the Tribunal found that the assessee had not sufficiently demonstrated the temporary nature of the funds and deposits. Therefore, the Tribunal remanded the issue back to the CIT(A) for a fresh examination, allowing the assessee to provide relevant documents to support its claim.

                          Conclusion:
                          The Tribunal dismissed the revenue's grounds related to the deduction under Section 10A but allowed the revenue's grounds concerning the standard deduction under Section 92C(2). The Tribunal remanded the TP issues and the classification of interest income back to the CIT(A) for fresh consideration, instructing a detailed and reasoned examination of the matters. Both appeals were allowed for statistical purposes.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found