Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner possessed the requisite qualification for appointment to the post of Computer under the Rajasthan Statistical Subordinate Service Rules, 1971 in light of the Government letter treating certain computer-related degrees and diplomas as equivalent to the RS-CIT certificate.
Analysis: The prescribed computer qualification under the recruitment rules was RS-CIT or a certificate declared equivalent by the competent department. The petitioner relied on a Government communication dated 30.05.2013 that recognised degrees and diplomas in Computer Science, Computer Application and Information Technology from universities established by law or recognised institutions as equivalent to the RS-CIT certificate. On that basis, the Court held that the petitioner's degree in Computer Science satisfied the eligibility requirement and that the rejection of candidature was not justified.
Conclusion: The petitioner was held eligible to be considered for appointment to the post of Computer.
Final Conclusion: The writ petition succeeded, and the respondents were directed to reconsider the petitioner's candidature for appointment with consequential service benefits, excluding actual salary and running monetary benefits.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the competent authority has recognised specified higher or equivalent computer qualifications as meeting the recruitment requirement, candidature cannot be rejected for want of the exact certificate originally prescribed.