<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 1479 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT  </title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285486</link>
    <description>The Rajasthan High Court held that, for recruitment to the post of Computer under the Rajasthan Statistical Subordinate Service Rules, 1971, a candidate could not be rejected for lacking the exact RS-CIT certificate where the competent department had already recognised specified computer science degrees and diplomas as equivalent. Relying on the Government communication dated 30.05.2013, the Court found that a degree in Computer Science satisfied the eligibility requirement. The petitioner was therefore eligible for appointment, and the respondents were directed to reconsider the candidature with consequential service benefits, excluding actual salary and running monetary benefits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Feb 2025 12:16:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=600279" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 1479 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT  </title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285486</link>
      <description>The Rajasthan High Court held that, for recruitment to the post of Computer under the Rajasthan Statistical Subordinate Service Rules, 1971, a candidate could not be rejected for lacking the exact RS-CIT certificate where the competent department had already recognised specified computer science degrees and diplomas as equivalent. Relying on the Government communication dated 30.05.2013, the Court found that a degree in Computer Science satisfied the eligibility requirement. The petitioner was therefore eligible for appointment, and the respondents were directed to reconsider the candidature with consequential service benefits, excluding actual salary and running monetary benefits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285486</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>