Letters Patent appeal maintainable where an execution objection affects valuable rights and terminates proceedings.

An objection to execution that challenged the very maintainability of the proceedings and, if accepted, would have terminated them was treated as a judgment for purposes of Clause 10 of the Letters Patent. The order was regarded as passed de hors the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, so it was not treated as an order under that Act. Section 10 of the Delhi High Court Act was held to confer only the appellate forum, not a separate substantive right of appeal. Applying the Clause 10 tests, an order deciding a matter of moment and affecting valuable rights was held appealable, and the appeal was maintained under that provision.

---

---

Issues: Whether the appeal against the order of the learned Single Judge was maintainable under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent and treated as a judgment.

Analysis: The objection to execution was directed against the very maintainability of the proceedings and, if upheld, would have the effect of terminating the proceedings. The order was held to have been passed de hors the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and therefore not as an order under that Act. Section 10 of the Delhi High Court Act was held to provide only the forum of appeal and not an independent right of appeal. Applying the tests for a judgment under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent, an order deciding a matter of moment and affecting valuable rights, with the effect of terminating proceedings, was treated as appealable.

Conclusion: The appeal was maintainable under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent and was directed to be treated as an appeal filed under that provision.

---