TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Court directs continued search for missing soldier believed to be alive</h1> <h3>Smt. Angrej Kaur Versus Union Of India & Ors</h3> The Court acknowledged the emotional distress of a petitioner seeking her husband, a soldier declared dead in 1971, believed to be alive and detained in a ... - Issues:Petition for writ of habeas corpus regarding the alleged detention of a soldier in a Pakistan jail despite being declared dead in 1971 during the Indo-Pak war.Analysis:The petitioner, wife of a B.S.F. Constable declared dead in 1971, believes he is alive and imprisoned in Kot Lakhpat Rai Jail, Pakistan. Despite official reports of his death, the petitioner's unwavering faith led her to seek her husband's return. Evidence from released prisoners and news articles supported her belief, prompting her to file a writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution of India for a writ of habeas corpus. The judiciary acknowledged the emotional turmoil of the petitioner and the need to balance legal technicalities with the pursuit of justice.The Court examined the steps taken by Indian authorities, including discussions with Pakistan officials, to locate the missing soldier. Efforts by the B.S.F. and Ministry of Home Affairs, along with the Ministry of External Affairs' involvement, demonstrated a comprehensive approach to resolving the matter. Despite initial denials by Pakistan, subsequent assurances of locating and repatriating the soldier were received. The Court commended the authorities for their diligent efforts and directed them to continue the search, emphasizing the importance of bringing back a soldier who may be alive and detained in a foreign prison.In delivering the judgment, the Court highlighted the essence of justice and the need to go beyond technicalities to serve the rightful recipient. While not issuing a writ of habeas corpus to foreign authorities, the Court directed Indian officials to persist in their search and provide regular updates to the petitioner. The judgment reflected a balance between legal procedures and the humanitarian aspect of reuniting a soldier with his family, underscoring the judiciary's role in delivering justice within the legal framework.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
