TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Supreme Court allows criminal proceedings against accused in homicide case, stresses fair trial</h1> <h3>Kari Choudhary Versus Sita Devi and Ors.</h3> The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's decision to quash criminal proceedings against the accused, including the mother-in-law, in a case involving ... - Issues:The case involves the issues of culpable homicide, transposition of the complainant as a delinquent offender, quashing of criminal proceedings, double jeopardy, multiple FIRs for the same case, and the authority of the police to continue investigation.Culpable Homicide and Transposition of Complainant:A mother-in-law was initially the complainant in a case of culpable homicide of her daughter-in-law, but later became one of the accused. The High Court halted the case against her based on her first complaint, leading the brother of the deceased to challenge this decision in the Supreme Court.Quashing of Criminal Proceedings and Double Jeopardy:The High Court quashed the criminal proceedings against the accused, including the mother-in-law, without a trial. The reasoning behind this decision was based on the concept of double jeopardy, as the police had previously filed a report deeming the initial complaint false, leading to charges against the mother-in-law.Multiple FIRs and Police Investigation:The police investigation revealed a different version of events, implicating the mother-in-law and others in the murder. Despite the quashing of the initial complaint, the police filed a charge sheet against the accused, leading to the case being committed to the sessions court for trial. The High Court's decision to quash the proceedings was challenged in the Supreme Court.Authority of Police to Continue Investigation:The Supreme Court highlighted that the police have the authority to conduct further investigation even after submitting a report under Section 173 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The ultimate goal of any investigation is to determine if the alleged offenses were committed and identify the perpetrators, emphasizing the importance of a fair trial.In conclusion, the Supreme Court allowed the appeal and set aside the High Court's decision, emphasizing that the quashing of proceedings based on technical grounds was not justified, and the case should proceed to trial for a legal adjudication.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
