https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282831 A prior complaint or earlier cognizance order did not bar further investigation into a murder case where the later police inquiry proceeded on a different version of the same incident. The Court held that Section 173(8) of the Criminal Procedure Code permits further investigation despite an earlier final report, and that rival versions of the same occurrence may both be investigated. The mere filing of a later police report was not impermissible in law, so the High Court was not justified in quashing the criminal proceedings and the murder prosecution was required to proceed to trial. en-us Tue, 11 Dec 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 27 Aug 2019 16:07:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282831 A prior complaint or earlier cognizance order did not bar further investigation into a murder case where the later police inquiry proceeded on a different version of the same incident. The Court held that Section 173(8) of the Criminal Procedure Code permits further investigation despite an earlier final report, and that rival versions of the same occurrence may both be investigated. The mere filing of a later police report was not impermissible in law, so the High Court was not justified in quashing the criminal proceedings and the murder prosecution was required to proceed to trial. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 11 Dec 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282831