Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the amount of Rs. 4 lakhs paid to the municipal committee for regularising deviations in the building plan was a penalty for infraction of municipal laws or a compensatory payment allowable as a business deduction.
Analysis: The payment arose under the municipal scheme permitting the committee, instead of requiring alteration or demolition of a building erected in deviation from sanctioned plans or after lapse of sanction, to accept a reasonable sum by way of compensation. The statutory scheme distinguished such compensation from penal consequences or prosecution for an offence. The assessee's business was construction and sale of flats, and the payment was made to preserve the building, regularise the deviations, and save the business stock from demolition. On ordinary commercial principles, the outgoing was directly connected with the carrying on of the business and was incurred to protect the profit-making apparatus and preserve the closing stock.
Conclusion: The amount was not a penalty for infraction of law and was an allowable deduction in computing business profits; the answer to the referred question was in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: A payment made under a statutory provision permitting ex post facto regularisation of building deviations by acceptance of compensation, where the payment is commercially necessary to preserve business stock and carry on the business, is not a penalty for breach of law and is deductible as business expenditure.