Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the penalty paid for delayed payment of cess and purchase tax under the U.P. Sugar-cane Cess Act, 1956 was an allowable deduction in computing business income.
Analysis: The liability to pay the amount arose from failure to comply with a statutory obligation under the cess legislation. The penalty was distinct from the cess itself and was incurred only because the assessee defaulted in payment on the prescribed date. The validating legislation did not convert penalty into cess for the purpose of deduction. A payment made as a consequence of breach of law is not expenditure laid out wholly and exclusively for the purpose of business, nor can it be justified on grounds of commercial expediency.
Conclusion: The penalty was not an allowable deduction and the answer to the reference was against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue.