Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether litigation expenses incurred for suing for damages arising out of cancellation of a liquor licence and stoppage of the business were admissible as revenue expenditure.
Analysis: The decisive test was the aim and object of the litigation and the character of the claim pursued. The suit was not directed to preserve or continue the business, but to recover damages for the loss caused by the stoppage of the business and sterilisation of the profit-making apparatus. The claim was substantially for compensation for loss of the source of income and not for a trading receipt. Expenses incurred to obtain a capital receipt are not deductible as business expenditure merely because the claim is quantified by reference to lost profits. The authorities dealing with cancellation of ordinary trading arrangements or litigation to protect the business were distinguishable.
Conclusion: The expenditure was not allowable as revenue expenditure and the answer was against the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Litigation expenses are deductible only when incurred wholly and exclusively for the purposes of carrying on or protecting the business; where the litigation is to recover compensation for loss of a source of income or destruction of the profit-making apparatus, the expenditure is capital in character and not allowable as revenue expenditure.