Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether penalties paid to the Pakistan Government for allowing import of molasses into Pakistan, in the stated circumstances, are deductible as expenditure "laid out or expended wholly or exclusively for the purpose of such business" under section 10(2)(xv) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: The agreed statements establish that import of molasses from India into East Pakistan was prohibited; the assessee nevertheless exported molasses which were seized by Pakistani authorities and later permitted entry only upon payment of penalties. The onus was on the assessees to prove that the penalties were incurred wholly or exclusively for the purpose of carrying on their business. Penalties paid for doing a prohibited act or for breach of foreign law are not normal commercial losses incidental to carrying on business. Precedent and principle require that deductible expenditures must be made to enable the earning of profits as part of legitimate business operations; payments incurred as penal consequences of unlawful acts are not of that character. The payments here were imposed because import was banned and were not shown to be necessary or contemplated incidents of carrying on lawful trade in Pakistan; allowance was therefore not established.
Conclusion: The penalties paid by the assessees are not deductible under section 10(2)(xv) of the Income-tax Act, 1961; the question is answered in the negative (decision against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue).