Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether interest income on money lent to debtor-companies accrued in Part B State or Part C State for the purpose of taxability and concessional treatment.
Analysis: The decisive factors were the place where the loan was actually advanced and the place where the right to repayment, with corresponding liability to pay interest, arose. In the absence of any agreement fixing a different place of repayment, the principle that the debtor must seek the creditor was applied. The Court also treated the territorial links at Bhilwara as substantial, since the loans were found to have been advanced there through the purchasing agents and the right to recover the loan and interest arose there. The Tribunal's contrary view that the nexus was illusory was not accepted on the facts found.
Conclusion: The interest income accrued to the assessee in Part B State and not in Part C State.
Final Conclusion: The reference was answered in favour of the assessee on the basis that the situs of accrual of interest was Bhilwara, giving the income a Part B State nexus.
Ratio Decidendi: In a money-lending transaction, where no contrary place of repayment is agreed, the situs of accrual of interest is determined by the place where the money is actually lent and where the corresponding right to repayment and liability to pay arise, applying the debtor-seeks-creditor principle.