Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2017 (4) TMI 1445 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal upholds Income Tax Act additions, remands advance issue to Assessing Officer for review. The Tribunal upheld the additions under Sections 23(1)(a) and 40A(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 but remanded the issue of advances back to the Assessing ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Tribunal upholds Income Tax Act additions, remands advance issue to Assessing Officer for review.

                          The Tribunal upheld the additions under Sections 23(1)(a) and 40A(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 but remanded the issue of advances back to the Assessing Officer for reconsideration, permitting the assessee to provide additional evidence. The appeal was partially allowed for statistical purposes.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Addition of Rs. 14,11,556/- as income from house property.
                          2. Addition of Rs. 21,967/- under Section 40A(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
                          3. Addition of Rs. 29,26,000/- on account of advances shown against flat booking.
                          4. Non-consideration of additional evidences furnished by the assessee under Rule 46A of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

                          Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

                          1. Addition of Rs. 14,11,556/- as Income from House Property:

                          The assessee argued that the addition made by the Assessing Officer (AO) was based on an incorrect application of Section 23(1)(a) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and should have instead considered Section 23(1)(c). The AO calculated the Annual Letting Value (ALV) of the vacant unsold portion of a multistory project, Rama's Janaki Vihar, on an assumption basis, leading to an addition of Rs. 14,11,556/-. The assessee contended that the property was partly let out, and the actual rent received should be considered under Section 23(1)(c). However, the CIT(A) and the Tribunal upheld the AO's decision, referencing the Delhi High Court's ruling in the case of Ansal Housing Finance and Leasing Co. Ltd., which stated that ALV is applicable regardless of actual income received. The Tribunal affirmed the CIT(A)'s order, rejecting the assessee's argument that the entire project should be considered as a single property.

                          2. Addition of Rs. 21,967/- under Section 40A(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961:

                          The AO disallowed Rs. 21,967/- under Section 40A(3) for cash payments made to Jaipur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd. (JVVNL) for electricity expenses, which exceeded the permissible limit. The assessee argued that the payments were genuine and made to a government agency, and thus should not be disallowed. The CIT(A) upheld the AO's decision, stating that JVVNL is not the government, and the payments did not fall under any exceptions provided in Rule 6DD. The Tribunal agreed with the CIT(A), noting that the assessee failed to demonstrate that the payments met the criteria for exemptions under Rule 6DD.

                          3. Addition of Rs. 29,26,000/- on Account of Advances Shown Against Flat Booking:

                          The AO treated the advances received from Shri Azad Hussain as bogus and added Rs. 29,26,000/- to the income. The assessee claimed that the amount was received in the financial year 2008-09 and was related to the sale of flat B-104, which was booked and possession handed over in that year. The assessee provided additional documents, including allotment and possession letters, to support this claim. The CIT(A) rejected the additional evidence, stating it did not meet the conditions under Rule 46A. The Tribunal, however, found merit in the assessee's claim and directed the AO to reconsider the issue, allowing the assessee to furnish supporting evidence to prove that the advances were received in earlier years.

                          4. Non-Consideration of Additional Evidences Furnished by the Assessee under Rule 46A:

                          The assessee submitted additional evidence, including allotment and possession letters, during the appellate proceedings, which were not available during the assessment. The CIT(A) refused to admit these under Rule 46A, stating the assessee did not meet the conditions for admitting additional evidence. The Tribunal found that these documents were crucial for deciding the issue of advances and directed the AO to admit and verify the additional evidence provided by the assessee.

                          Conclusion:

                          The Tribunal upheld the additions made under Sections 23(1)(a) and 40A(3) but remanded the issue of advances back to the AO for fresh consideration, allowing the assessee to present additional evidence. The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found