Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Section 40A(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 applies to cash payments exceeding Rs.20,000 made to the principal supplier where payments were made in cash pursuant to the supplier's directive and the payments were genuine and reflected in the parties' accounts.
Analysis: Section 40A(3) disallows deduction for payments above the prescribed limit made otherwise than by account payee cheque or bank draft, subject to prescribed exceptions. Rule 6DD lists specific circumstances where disallowance shall not be made, but the proviso to Section 40A(3) and settled precedents recognise that considerations of business expediency, genuineness of transaction and identity of the payee can exempt a bona fide payment from disallowance. On the facts decided, cash payments were made only because the supplier instructed distributors to pay in cash to avoid delay in receipt of goods, the payments were genuine and recorded in the supplier's account, and the supplier undertook to deposit the amounts in bank. The Tribunal's sole reliance on absence of a literal fit within Rule 6DD(j) overlooked the proviso and authoritative decisions recognising business exigencies and the primacy of genuineness and payee identity.
Conclusion: Section 40A(3) does not apply to the cash payments in question; the disallowance under Section 40A(3) is not warranted in respect of those payments.