Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a plaintiff in a suit for rendition of accounts can withdraw the suit as of right before any preliminary decree is passed, and whether the defendant acquires any vested right that prevents such withdrawal.
Analysis: Order 23 Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure confers on the plaintiff an unqualified right to withdraw a suit, subject to the consequences prescribed by the rule, unless some independent vested right has already accrued to the defendant. In a suit for accounts, a defendant does not ordinarily obtain a right to compel the plaintiff to proceed merely because accounts may later disclose a sum due to the defendant. Such a right, if any, can arise only after a preliminary decree for rendition of accounts has been passed. On the facts, no preliminary decree had been made, the written statement did not amount to a set-off, and no counterclaim was available. The defendant therefore had no vested right capable of defeating withdrawal.
Conclusion: The plaintiff was entitled to withdraw the suit, and the refusal to compel its continuation was justified. The appeal failed.
Ratio Decidendi: A plaintiff may withdraw a suit before a preliminary decree for accounts is passed unless the defendant has already acquired a vested right, such as by set-off, counterclaim, or a decree crystallizing relief in his favour.