Unconditional withdrawal of suit upheld where no counterclaim or procedural bar existed under Order 23 Rule 1 CPC.
A plaintiff retains an unqualified right to withdraw a suit under Order 23 Rule 1 CPC where no counterclaim has been filed and no other procedural bar exists. Here, although the defendants objected on grounds of serious pleadings, lack of apology, and incurred costs, the withdrawal followed a settlement, was sought before trial, and was not blocked by any application to vacate the status quo order. The court allowed unconditional withdrawal of the suit and pending applications, bringing the interlocutory matters to an end and vacating the interim order.
Issues: Whether the plaintiffs were entitled to unconditionally withdraw the suit and the pending applications.
Analysis: The withdrawal was sought after a settlement and before trial. The defendants opposed withdrawal on the basis of alleged serious pleadings, absence of apology, and the costs already incurred, but no counterclaim had been filed and no application for vacating the status quo order had been moved. In the absence of any procedural bar, the plaintiff's right to withdraw the suit without seeking permission to institute a fresh suit remained available.
Conclusion: The application for withdrawal was allowed and the plaintiffs were permitted to unconditionally withdraw the suit and pending applications.
Final Conclusion: The suit ceased to survive and all connected interlocutory matters were brought to an end, with the interim order vacated.
Ratio Decidendi: In the absence of a counterclaim or other procedural constraint, a plaintiff retains an unqualified right to withdraw a suit under Order 23 Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
TaxTMI 
AI Drafter ✕
TaxTMI 
