2010 (10) TMI 1070
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....te and Research Centre, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the "EHIRC-Delhi"), with Escorts Heart Institute and Research Centre, Chandigarh (hereinafter referred to as the ?EHIRC-Chandigarh). In the alternative, declaration to the effect that amalgamation of EHIRC- Delhi with EHIRC- Chandigarh, was void and bad in law. 2. Before this matter could go to trial, now the plaintiffs have come up with this application stating that in view of the Settlement-Agreement of 20th October, 2010, executed between the plaintiff and defendants No. 2 and 9, no grievance is left, so plaintiffs do not want to proceed with this suit. Accordingly, permission is sought to withdraw this suit along with pending applications. 3. Learned Senior Counsel f....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....instructions from the plaintiffs to unconditionally withdraw this suit, irrespective of any kind of settlement arrived at between the plaintiffs and defendants No. 2 and 9. It is further asserted by learned Senior Counsel for the plaintiffs that this is not the stage to go into the nature of allegations or averments made in the plaint, as now the plaintiffs are unconditionally withdrawing this suit and the pending applications. 8. According to the learned Senior Counsel for the plaintiffs, they did not derive out any benefit out of the interim Order of status quo, as the amalgamation had already taken place and infact, an application under Order 39 Rule 2A of the CPC had been filed by the plaintiffs and defendants, at no point of time, had ....