Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether an order of remand passed by a single Judge in second appeal amounts to a judgment within clause 10 of the Letters Patent, and whether all remand orders are appealable.
Analysis: The controlling test adopted by the majority is whether the impugned order conclusively decides the controversy, wholly or partly, so far as the Court making it is concerned. An order that merely remits an issue for trial or directs further evidence is treated as a step in the progress of the suit and not as a judgment. By contrast, where the appellate Court sets aside the decree under appeal and sends the case back on the basis of a binding decision on the merits, the order has sufficient finality and falls within the expression "judgment" in clause 10. The reasoning distinguishes between procedural or ancillary directions and adjudications that determine substantive rights or unsettle an existing decree.
Conclusion: A remand order is not automatically a judgment, but where it sets aside the decree and conclusively determines the controversy to that extent, it is a judgment and is appealable under clause 10.
Dissenting Opinion: Mudholkar J. held that the word "judgment" in clause 10 of the Letters Patent means a decree in civil cases, and that a remand order not amounting to a decree is not appealable. He therefore answered the reference in the negative.
Ratio Decidendi: An order of remand is a judgment under clause 10 of the Letters Patent only when it conclusively determines the controversy, wholly or partly, and not when it merely directs further trial or evidence on a procedural issue.