Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, after amalgamation under the Banking Regulation Act, the transferor-bank could still be said to be carrying on business so as to claim deduction of bad debts in computing its income.
Analysis: The scheme of amalgamation under section 45 of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949, made the transferee-bank the entity in control of the assets and liabilities of the transferor-bank from the prescribed date and brought the transferor-bank's business to a halt. The notification and scheme showed that the transferor-bank was required to close and balance its books and thereafter no longer carried on banking activity. Although realisation of debts and turning assets to account may constitute business within section 6(1)(i), that premise failed here because the transferor-bank itself was no longer carrying on the main banking business, and the alleged agency through the transferee-bank was inconsistent with the scheme of amalgamation.
Conclusion: The assessee-bank was not carrying on business after amalgamation and was not entitled to deduct the bad debt of Rs. 58,560.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a banking company's business stands terminated by a statutory scheme of amalgamation under section 45 of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949, it cannot claim business deductions on the footing that it continues to carry on ancillary business through the transferee-bank.