Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By: ?
Even if Sort by Date is selected, exact match will be shown on the top.
RelevanceDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        Note

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Surplus from sale of machinery not taxable under Income-tax Act

        The Liquidators Of Pursa Limited Versus Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Bihar

        The Liquidators Of Pursa Limited Versus Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Bihar - [1954] 25 ITR 265 Issues Involved:
        1. Whether the surplus of Rs. 13,05,144 arising from the sale of the plant and machinery of the sugar factory is chargeable under Section 10(2)(vii) of the Indian Income-tax Act.
        2. Whether the profit of Rs. 15,882 on the sale of stores of the factory is taxable under the Income-tax Act in the circumstances of this case.

        Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

        1. Surplus from the Sale of Plant and Machinery:
        The primary issue was whether the surplus of Rs. 13,05,144 arising from the sale of the plant and machinery of the sugar factory is chargeable under Section 10(2)(vii) of the Indian Income-tax Act. The Tribunal initially referred to two considerations for its decision:

        - The company admitted to carrying on its business up to the date of the sale of the machinery, i.e., 7th December 1943.
        - The company did not sell its sugar stocks amounting to over Rs. 6,00,000 on 7th December 1943, indicating that the company carried on business even after the sale of machinery.

        The Tribunal concluded that the sale of machinery was part of the company's business operations. However, the Supreme Court found that the Tribunal misdirected itself in law by not considering that the machinery and plant were not used for the purposes of the business during the accounting year. The machinery and plant must be used for the purpose of the business actually carried on and the profits of which are assessable under Section 10(1). The Court noted that the machinery and plant were not used at any time during the accounting year, thereby excluding the second proviso to Section 10(2)(vii) from application.

        The Supreme Court emphasized that the sale of machinery and plant was a step in the process of winding up the business, not an operation in furtherance of the business. Therefore, the surplus from the sale was not chargeable under Section 10(2)(vii). The Court answered the first question in the negative.

        2. Profit on the Sale of Stores:
        The second issue was whether the profit of Rs. 15,882 on the sale of stores of the factory is taxable under the Income-tax Act. The High Court had provided a divergent opinion on this matter, with one judge answering in the affirmative and another in the negative. The third judge agreed with the negative opinion.

        Given that the department did not appeal against the High Court's decision on the second question, the Supreme Court did not address this issue further. Thus, the profit of Rs. 15,882 on the sale of stores was not taxable under the Income-tax Act.

        Conclusion:
        The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, concluding that the surplus from the sale of plant and machinery was not chargeable under Section 10(2)(vii) of the Indian Income-tax Act. The respondent was ordered to pay the costs of the appellants both in the Supreme Court and the High Court. The appeal was allowed.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found