Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the surplus arising from the sale of the plant and machinery of the sugar factory was chargeable as deemed profits under Section 10(2)(vii) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922.
Analysis: The decisive question was whether the machinery and plant sold had been used for the purposes of the business during the accounting year so as to attract the second proviso to Section 10(2)(vii). The Court held that the machinery and plant had not been used at all during the relevant year and that the sale formed part of the process of gradual winding up and realisation of assets, not an operation carried on in furtherance of the business. It also held that the Tribunal had misdirected itself in law by treating the sale as part of the carrying on of business and by ignoring the statutory requirement that the machinery or plant must have been used in the business during the accounting year.
Conclusion: The surplus on the sale of the plant and machinery was not taxable under Section 10(2)(vii); the answer to the referred question was in the negative and the assessee succeeded.
Ratio Decidendi: The second proviso to Section 10(2)(vii) applies only to machinery or plant that was used for the purposes of the business during the relevant accounting year, and sale proceeds realised in the course of winding up of the business are not taxable as deemed profits where that condition is absent.