Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the dividend income arising from shares settled in trust for the assessee's wife was includible in the assessee's total income under section 16(1)(c) or section 16(3)(b) of the Income-tax Act.
Analysis: The trust deed divested the settlor of the shares and vested them in the trustee, so the assets could not be treated as remaining the property of the settlor within section 16(1)(c). The settlement was also not revocable for the relevant period and no direct or indirect benefit to the settlor was shown, bringing it within the statutory exclusion from that clause. As to section 16(3)(b), a declaration of trust by a settlor acting as trustee was treated as a transfer of assets, since the settlor holds a different legal character as trustee. The words of the clause were held wide enough to cover transfer to oneself in a different legal capacity. The expression "adequate consideration" was held not to include natural love and affection, because such a reading would largely defeat the provision in the context of transfers for the benefit of a or minor child.
Conclusion: The dividend income was includible in the assessee's total income under section 16(3)(b) and not excluded by section 16(1)(c).
Final Conclusion: The reference was answered in the affirmative, holding that the income was assessable in the hands of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: A declaration of trust by which a settlor divests property for the benefit of his wife can constitute a transfer of assets for section 16(3)(b), and natural love and affection is not adequate consideration for that provision.