Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether maintenance payments made by the assessee under a decree charging his estate were part of his taxable income, or whether they were diverted before reaching him as income.
Analysis: The payment was not a mere application of income after receipt. The decree fastened a charge on the assessee's resources and required payment to the step-mother before the amounts could be treated as his income. What was diverted by an overriding charge never formed part of the sum that reached him as income. The statutory scheme taxed only income that accrued to or was received by the assessee, and the maintenance burden did not fall within any exemption or allowance because the true question was one of characterisation of the amount itself, not of deduction after accrual.
Conclusion: The maintenance amount was not taxable income of the assessee, and the sum of Rs. 9,900 was rightly to be excluded from the assessment.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a pre-existing charge diverts a sum from the assessee's resources before it reaches him as income, that sum is not taxable as his income under the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922.