<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1957 (9) TMI 80 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276871</link>
    <description>Dividend income from shares settled in trust for the assessee&#039;s wife was held includible in the assessee&#039;s total income under section 16(3)(b) of the Income-tax Act. The trust deed divested the settlor of ownership, so the shares could not be treated as remaining his property under section 16(1)(c), and no revocable settlement or direct or indirect benefit to the settlor was shown. A declaration of trust by a settlor acting as trustee was treated as a transfer of assets because the settlor assumes a different legal character in that capacity. Natural love and affection was not accepted as adequate consideration for section 16(3)(b).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Sep 1957 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2018 17:45:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=542659" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1957 (9) TMI 80 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276871</link>
      <description>Dividend income from shares settled in trust for the assessee&#039;s wife was held includible in the assessee&#039;s total income under section 16(3)(b) of the Income-tax Act. The trust deed divested the settlor of ownership, so the shares could not be treated as remaining his property under section 16(1)(c), and no revocable settlement or direct or indirect benefit to the settlor was shown. A declaration of trust by a settlor acting as trustee was treated as a transfer of assets because the settlor assumes a different legal character in that capacity. Natural love and affection was not accepted as adequate consideration for section 16(3)(b).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Sep 1957 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276871</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>