Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a workman whose retrenchment is found invalid and who is ordered to be reinstated with continuity of service is ordinarily entitled to full back wages, and whether the facts of the case justified scaling down that relief.
Analysis: In industrial jurisprudence, reinstatement with continuity of service restores the workman to the position he would have occupied but for the illegal termination. Where the employer's action is found to be invalid or motivated, the workman is normally entitled to full back wages, subject to deduction for any gainful employment during the enforced absence. The discretion to reduce back wages must be exercised judicially on cogent and convincing grounds. Financial difficulty of the employer, standing alone, is not enough to deny the workman the wages lost because of illegal retrenchment, especially when the workmen are the weaker party and no material shows comparable sacrifice by management. On the facts, the unit had begun making profits, some retrenched workmen had been recalled for work for substantial periods, and the award of full back wages required modification to reflect the circumstances.
Conclusion: Full back wages are ordinarily the rule after invalid termination and reinstatement, but the relief was justifiably reduced on the facts to 75% of back wages after appropriate set-offs.
Ratio Decidendi: Where retrenchment or termination is held illegal and reinstatement with continuity of service is granted, full back wages ordinarily follow unless the employer proves special circumstances warranting departure, and any reduction must rest on judicially sound reasons.