1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New: Section-Wise Filter ✕
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>ITAT Upholds Deletion of Undisclosed Income Addition: Importance of Registered Sale Deed</h1> The ITAT dismissed the Revenue's appeals, upholding the CIT (A)'s decision to delete the addition of undisclosed income. The importance of the registered ... - Issues involved: The issues involved in this case are related to the addition of undisclosed income u/s 133A, assessment based on survey findings, discrepancies in sale consideration, cross-examination of witnesses, and the validity of registered sale deed.Summary:Issue 1: Addition of undisclosed income u/s 133AThe appeals filed by the Revenue were against the order of CIT (A) directing to delete the addition of Rs. 8,20,150 without considering the confirmation given by a witness. The survey u/s 133A revealed discrepancies in the sale consideration of a property leading to the addition of undisclosed income by the Assessing Officer (AO). The ITAT set aside the assessment and directed the AO to allow cross-examination of witnesses.Issue 2: Discrepancies in sale considerationThe assessee contended that the vendor's claim of receiving Rs. 26,00,000 was false and unsupported by evidence. The CIT (A) held that the value mentioned in the registered sale deed should be accepted as the consideration, as the vendor's statement lacked verifiable evidence. The ITAT rejected the Revenue's appeal, emphasizing the importance of the registered sale deed in determining the actual consideration.Issue 3: Cross-examination of witnessesDespite the ITAT's direction to allow cross-examination, the assessee was not given a fair opportunity to do so. The lack of proper cross-examination raised doubts about the authenticity of the vendor's claim and the witness's statement regarding the sale consideration.Conclusion:The ITAT dismissed the Revenue's appeals, upholding the CIT (A)'s decision to delete the addition of undisclosed income. The importance of the registered sale deed and the lack of substantial evidence to contradict its value were crucial in determining the outcome of the case.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
