<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (8) TMI 1131 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273086</link>
    <description>The ITAT dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals, upholding the CIT (A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of undisclosed income. The importance of the registered sale deed and the lack of substantial evidence to contradict its value were crucial in determining the outcome of the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2018 12:03:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=522398" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (8) TMI 1131 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273086</link>
      <description>The ITAT dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals, upholding the CIT (A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of undisclosed income. The importance of the registered sale deed and the lack of substantial evidence to contradict its value were crucial in determining the outcome of the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273086</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>