Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether penalty under section 28(1)(c) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 could validly be imposed on the firm as constituted at the time of levy, where the original partnership had dissolved and a new partnership had come into existence.
Analysis: The relevant partnership carrying on the business during the assessment year was found to have dissolved on the death of one partner, and a fresh partnership was later constituted between two other persons under a separate instrument. Section 44 of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 made the partners of the discontinued firm jointly and severally liable for assessment and for liabilities arising in the course of such assessment, including penalty. The statutory liability attached to the old firm and its partners, but the provision did not authorize imposition of that penalty on a different and subsequently constituted firm.
Conclusion: The penalty could not be validly levied on the firm as constituted at the time of the levy; the question was answered in the negative and in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Under section 44 of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, liability for penalty arising from assessment of a discontinued firm attaches to the partners of the firm as it existed when the liability arose, and cannot be shifted to a later reconstituted firm.