<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1964 (1) TMI 58 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273040</link>
    <description>Penalty liability for a discontinued partnership under the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 attached to the partners of the firm as it existed when the assessment-related liability arose. The original partnership had dissolved on the death of a partner, and a later firm was constituted under a separate instrument. Section 44 made the partners of the discontinued firm jointly and severally liable for assessment-related liabilities, including penalty, but it did not permit the penalty to be levied on a different, subsequently reconstituted firm. The penalty therefore could not be validly imposed on the firm as constituted at the time of levy, and the issue was answered for the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jan 1964 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2018 15:41:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=522229" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1964 (1) TMI 58 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273040</link>
      <description>Penalty liability for a discontinued partnership under the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 attached to the partners of the firm as it existed when the assessment-related liability arose. The original partnership had dissolved on the death of a partner, and a later firm was constituted under a separate instrument. Section 44 made the partners of the discontinued firm jointly and severally liable for assessment-related liabilities, including penalty, but it did not permit the penalty to be levied on a different, subsequently reconstituted firm. The penalty therefore could not be validly imposed on the firm as constituted at the time of levy, and the issue was answered for the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jan 1964 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273040</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>