Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether printing annual reports for specific customers on their specifications amounted to a works contract and not a taxable sale, and whether the consequential penalty could survive.
Analysis: The transaction was found to be for printing annual reports exclusively for particular customers, with the finished product having no marketability in the open market. Applying the settled test that the nature of the contract depends on the intention of the parties and whether the finished product is a commercial commodity, the Court held that such printing activity fell within works contract. The incidental transfer of paper used in execution of the work did not convert the transaction into a sale. Once the principal transaction was held not exigible to tax, the penalty proceedings based on the same assessment could not stand.
Conclusion: The transaction was held to be a works contract and not liable to tax under the Act, and the penalty was unsustainable. The revision was therefore allowed in favour of the assessee.