<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 1427 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268618</link>
    <description>Printing annual reports exclusively for identified customers on their specifications was treated as a works contract because the finished product had no open-market marketability and the parties intended execution of specialised printing work rather than a taxable sale. The incidental transfer of paper used in performing the job did not change the character of the transaction into a sale. As the principal transaction was not exigible to tax, penalty proceedings founded on the same assessment could not survive.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2015 12:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=406956" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 1427 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268618</link>
      <description>Printing annual reports exclusively for identified customers on their specifications was treated as a works contract because the finished product had no open-market marketability and the parties intended execution of specialised printing work rather than a taxable sale. The incidental transfer of paper used in performing the job did not change the character of the transaction into a sale. As the principal transaction was not exigible to tax, penalty proceedings founded on the same assessment could not survive.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268618</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>