Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether reversal of the entire CENVAT credit taken on common inputs used for both dutiable and exempted goods could be treated as if no credit had been availed, so as to satisfy the condition of Notification No. 10/2002-CE and preserve the exemption benefit.
Analysis: The appellant had initially taken credit on common inputs, but later reversed the entire credit, including the portion relatable to inputs used for the dutiable spare parts. The dispute turned on whether such reversal neutralised the earlier availment of credit for the purpose of the notification condition. The Tribunal followed the settled position that complete reversal of credit puts the assessee in the same position as if credit had not been taken. The appellant also accepted liability to pay interest for the period during which the credit was utilised.
Conclusion: The reversal was sufficient to treat the credit as not availed, and the denial of exemption was unsustainable; the appeal was allowed in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Where inadmissible CENVAT credit is fully reversed, the legal effect is that the credit is treated as never having been availed for the purpose of satisfying an exemption notification condition.