<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 2395 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267121</link>
    <description>Complete reversal of CENVAT credit taken on common inputs used for both dutiable and exempted goods was held to place the assessee in the same position as if no credit had been availed. On that basis, the condition in Notification No. 10/2002-CE was satisfied and the exemption could not be denied. The Tribunal treated the full reversal, together with acceptance of interest liability for the period of utilisation, as sufficient to neutralise the earlier credit availment. The denial of exemption was therefore unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2015 15:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=403652" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 2395 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267121</link>
      <description>Complete reversal of CENVAT credit taken on common inputs used for both dutiable and exempted goods was held to place the assessee in the same position as if no credit had been availed. On that basis, the condition in Notification No. 10/2002-CE was satisfied and the exemption could not be denied. The Tribunal treated the full reversal, together with acceptance of interest liability for the period of utilisation, as sufficient to neutralise the earlier credit availment. The denial of exemption was therefore unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267121</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>