Surtax capital computation treats provisions for known liabilities as non-reserves, excluding debenture redemption amounts and limiting gratuity surplus inclusion.

For surtax capital computation, an amount earmarked for a known or certain future liability is treated as a provision, not a reserve, and therefore does not enter the capital base. On gratuity, the classification depends on whether the appropriation exceeds the actuarially determined liability; only any established surplus can be treated as a reserve and included. On debenture redemption, an amount set aside to meet the binding obligation to redeem debentures is a provision and is excluded from capital. The gratuity reserve issue was left open only to the extent of any excess over actuarial liability.

---

---

Issues: (i) whether the gratuity reserve was includible in computing the capital of the assessee company under rule 1 of the Second Schedule to the Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, 1964; (ii) whether the debenture redemption reserve was includible in computing the capital of the assessee company under rule 1 of the Second Schedule to the Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, 1964.

Issue (i): whether the gratuity reserve was includible in computing the capital of the assessee company under rule 1 of the Second Schedule to the Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, 1964

Analysis: The character of the amount depends on whether it is truly a reserve or a provision. An appropriation made to meet a known liability, including a contingent gratuity liability, may be a provision, while only any excess over the estimated liability can be treated as a reserve. The material on record did not show whether the appropriation towards gratuity had been made on an actuarial basis or whether any part exceeded the estimated liability.

Conclusion: The matter was remitted for determination of whether any excess existed over the actuarially determined gratuity liability, and only such excess, if found, would be includible as a reserve.

Issue (ii): whether the debenture redemption reserve was includible in computing the capital of the assessee company under rule 1 of the Second Schedule to the Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, 1964

Analysis: The reserve had been created to meet an existing obligation to redeem secured redeemable debentures. An amount set aside to discharge a certain future liability is a provision and not a reserve. Since the liability to redeem the debentures was binding and the reserve was intended for that purpose, the amount could not be treated as part of the capital base.

Conclusion: The debenture redemption reserve was not includible in computing the capital of the assessee company.

Final Conclusion: The reference was answered by excluding the debenture redemption reserve from capital computation and by leaving the gratuity reserve issue open only to the extent of any excess over the actuarially determined liability, to be decided by the Tribunal.

Ratio Decidendi: For surtax capital computation, an amount set aside to meet a known or certain future liability is a provision and not a reserve, and only any surplus over the liability, if established on proper valuation, can be treated as a reserve.

---