Surtax capital computation: dividend adjustment, debenture redemption reserve, and gratuity reserve treatment narrowed by actuarial liability testing.

For surtax capital computation under rule 1 of the Second Schedule to the Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, declared dividend must be adjusted against general reserve, following Vazir Sultan Tobacco; the point was decided for the Revenue. A debenture redemption reserve is not includible as capital because it is not a reserve for this purpose, and the court distinguished preference share redemption cases; this too was decided for the Revenue. A gratuity reserve is likewise not generally includible, but on remand the Tribunal must examine whether any amount exceeds the actual actuarial gratuity liability, in which event only that excess may be treated as reserve.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the dividend declared should reduce the general reserve for computing capital under rule 1 of the Second Schedule to the Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, 1964; (ii) whether the debenture redemption reserve is includible in the computation of capital; (iii) whether the gratuity reserve is includible in the computation of capital.

Issue (i): Whether the dividend declared should reduce the general reserve for computing capital under rule 1 of the Second Schedule to the Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, 1964.

Analysis: The issue was treated as covered by the Supreme Court decision in Vazir Sultan Tobacco Co. Ltd., and the declared dividend was to be adjusted against the general reserve for capital computation.

Conclusion: The issue was answered in the affirmative and in favour of the Revenue.

Issue (ii): Whether the debenture redemption reserve is includible in the computation of capital.

Analysis: The distinction between a reserve and a provision was considered, but the court followed its earlier decision in the assessee's own case and held that a reserve created for redemption of debentures is not a reserve for capital computation. The decisions dealing with preference share redemption reserves were distinguished because the right to redemption of debentures vests in the debenture-holders.

Conclusion: The issue was answered in the negative and in favour of the Revenue.

Issue (iii): Whether the gratuity reserve is includible in the computation of capital.

Analysis: The gratuity reserve was held not to be a reserve, but the court directed that, on remand to the Tribunal, the amount should be examined to determine whether any part exceeded the actual gratuity liability on actuarial basis, and only such excess, if any, would be treated as reserve.

Conclusion: The issue was answered in the negative and in favour of the Revenue, subject to examination of any excess over actuarial liability.

Final Conclusion: The reference was substantially decided against the assessee, with the first two questions answered for the Revenue and the third also answered for the Revenue with a limited factual examination directed on remand to the Tribunal.

Ratio Decidendi: For surtax capital computation, a debenture redemption reserve is not a reserve, and a gratuity reserve is not includible as reserve except to the extent it exceeds the actual actuarial gratuity liability.

---