Debenture redemption fund treated as reserve and included in capital base for surtax purposes.

Amounts set apart out of profits for future debenture redemption are treated as a reserve, not a provision, where the liability has not yet arisen on the balance-sheet date. Applying the distinction laid down in Vazir Sultan and related authorities, the court held that a liability to redeem debentures was not a current charge on the relevant accounting year's profits. The debenture redemption fund therefore retained the character of capital employed in the business and was includible in the capital base for surtax purposes, with the issue answered in favour of the assessee.

---

---

Issues: Whether the amount standing to the credit of the debenture redemption fund was a reserve includible in the capital base for surtax purposes or a provision excluded from capital.

Analysis: The distinction between a reserve and a provision turns on the true nature and character of the amount and the purpose for which it is set apart. A provision is made against a liability existing in praesenti, even if the exact amount is not known, whereas a reserve is an appropriation of profits kept apart for future use when the liability has not yet arisen. The Court applied the principles laid down by the Supreme Court in Vazir Sultan and related decisions, holding that the liability to redeem the debentures was not a current charge on the profits of the relevant accounting year. Since the fund had been created out of profits and was retained for future redemption, it represented capital employed in the business and not a present liability within the balance-sheet year.

Conclusion: The debenture redemption fund was a reserve and was includible in the capital base. The question was answered in favour of the assessee.

Ratio Decidendi: An amount set apart out of profits for a liability that has not yet arisen is a reserve, while only liabilities existing on the balance-sheet date can be treated as provisions.

---