TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>High Court clarifies order; no stay on demand, allows interim relief. Tribunal may grant conditional stay.</h1> The Punjab and Haryana High Court clarified that its order did not stay the demand but allowed petitioners to seek interim relief. The Tribunal could ... Waiver of pre deposit - held that:- In view of the orders passed by a learned Single Judge of the Kerala High Court in the case titled M/s Muthoot Finance Ltd. Vs Union of India and another, [2015 (3) TMI 634 - KERALA HIGH COURT], the respondents shall not treat the appeal as being not maintainable on account of the failure to deposit the amounts as per the amended Section 35-F of the Central Excise Act, 1944 which came into effect on 06.08.2014. The Punjab and Haryana High Court issued a notice of motion to the respondents returnable on 29.06.2015. The petitioners sought a stay of the pre-deposit, citing a case from the Kerala High Court regarding the deposit amount under the Central Excise Act. The court clarified that their order did not stay the demand, but allowed the petitioners to apply for interim relief based on previous provisions. The Tribunal could decide on granting a conditional stay.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
