Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the amended pre-deposit requirement under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944 applies to appeals filed after 6 August 2014, regardless of the date of the show cause notice or adjudication order, and whether appeals filed without the prescribed deposit are maintainable.
Analysis: The amended Section 35F replaced the earlier discretionary regime of waiver on undue hardship with a mandatory deposit of a fixed percentage before an appeal can be entertained. The second proviso expressly excludes only stay applications and appeals pending before the appellate authority prior to the commencement of the Finance (No. 2) Act, 2014, showing that appeals filed after commencement are governed by the new provision. The prior law did not confer an unrestricted right to appeal without deposit, and the substituted provision is more favourable in amount though mandatory in effect. The exclusion for pending matters confirms the legislative intent to apply the amended requirement to all later-filed appeals, irrespective of the period of dispute or the date of the impugned order.
Conclusion: The amended Section 35F applies to the appeals in question, the appeals were not maintainable without the prescribed pre-deposit, and dismissal was warranted.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a substituted pre-deposit provision contains an express saving clause only for pending appeals and stay applications, the amended mandatory deposit requirement applies to all appeals filed after its commencement.