Dismissal of Appeals Due to Lack of Substantial Legal Questions - Brand Name Use and Extended Limitation Period

The High Court of Madhya Pradesh dismissed appeals C.E.A. No. 57/2011 and C.E.A. No. 50/2011 as no substantial question of law arose. The Tribunal noted no record of relinquishment of the brand name "ECONOPRINT" and applied an extended period of limitation for demanding duty due to non-disclosure of brand name use. Consequently, the appeals were dismissed.

---

---

The High Court of Madhya Pradesh dismissed appeals C.E.A. No. 57/2011 and C.E.A. No. 50/2011 as they were heard with companion appeals and no substantial question of law arose. The Tribunal found that no record showed relinquishment of the brand name "ECONOPRINT" and extended period of limitation for demanding duty applied due to non-disclosure of brand name use. The appeals were dismissed accordingly.

---