https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265363 The High Court of Madhya Pradesh dismissed appeals C.E.A. No. 57/2011 and C.E.A. No. 50/2011 as no substantial question of law arose. The Tribunal noted no record of relinquishment of the brand name "ECONOPRINT" and applied an extended period of limitation for demanding duty due to non-disclosure of brand name use. Consequently, the appeals were dismissed. en-us Mon, 17 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 11 Oct 2015 18:48:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265363 The High Court of Madhya Pradesh dismissed appeals C.E.A. No. 57/2011 and C.E.A. No. 50/2011 as no substantial question of law arose. The Tribunal noted no record of relinquishment of the brand name "ECONOPRINT" and applied an extended period of limitation for demanding duty due to non-disclosure of brand name use. Consequently, the appeals were dismissed. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 17 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265363