Job-work valuation dispute: return of processed goods to the principal manufacturer supported prima facie relief from predeposit and recovery.

Job-work clearances returned to the principal manufacturer were held to present a prima facie case against inclusion of the value of materials supplied under job-work challans. The appellants processed goods received from principal manufacturers, paid duty on the value addition, and returned the goods after carbon lining. As the goods were not sold to third parties, the job-work procedure was followed, and the Revenue did not dispute the nature of the activity, the cited Tribunal principle on Rule 10(a) was applied to hold that it did not govern such a job worker. Waiver of predeposit and stay of recovery were therefore granted.

---

---

Issues: Whether the appellants had made out a prima facie case for waiver of predeposit and stay of recovery in a dispute concerning duty demand on job-work clearances returned to the principal manufacturer.

Analysis: The appellants received goods from the principal manufacturers for job work, carried out carbon lining, and returned the processed goods to the same principal manufacturers. The duty had been paid on the value addition made by the appellants, while the Revenue sought to include the value of materials supplied under job-work challans. The order notes that the goods were not sold to third parties, the job-work procedure was followed, and the Revenue did not dispute the nature of the job work. In view of the cited Tribunal authority that Rule 10(a) would not apply to a job worker who completes the work and returns the goods to the principal manufacturer, the appellants were held to have a prima facie case.

Conclusion: Waiver of predeposit and stay of recovery were granted in favour of the appellants.

---