TaxTMI Login
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Just a moment...
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) whether the value of driving lugs received for job work and welded to the clutch covers was includible in the assessable value of the goods cleared by the appellant; (ii) whether the demand was barred by limitation and the extended period was invocable.
Issue (i): whether the value of driving lugs received for job work and welded to the clutch covers was includible in the assessable value of the goods cleared by the appellant.
Analysis: The goods were not sold as complete clutch covers with lugs supplied free of cost by the buyer. The lugs were sent under job work challans and the welding activity was undertaken under Rule 4(5)(a) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002. In such a job-work arrangement, the value of the lugs was to be taken care of in the buyer's final assembly and not added again to the value of the intermediate goods cleared by the appellant. The principle applied was that the value of inputs supplied for job work is not includible in the value of the intermediate product manufactured on job work basis.
Conclusion: The value of the driving lugs was not includible in the assessable value of the clutch covers cleared by the appellant, and this issue was decided in favour of the assessee.
Issue (ii): whether the demand was barred by limitation and the extended period was invocable.
Analysis: The movements of the driving lugs and the finished goods were covered by challans and the records disclosed the job-work arrangement. On those facts, there was no basis to attribute suppression of facts, misstatement, or any intent to evade duty to the appellant. Since the department had no sustainable foundation for invoking the longer limitation period, the demand could not survive on limitation either.
Conclusion: The demand was barred by limitation and the extended period could not be invoked, which was decided in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The duty demand, penalty, and interest could not be sustained either on valuation or on limitation, and the appeal succeeded in full.
Ratio Decidendi: In a genuine job-work arrangement carried out under the prescribed challan procedure, the value of inputs supplied for the intermediate process is not includible in the assessable value of the intermediate product, and disclosure through regular records negatives suppression for invoking the extended period.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
