<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (7) TMI 305 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261344</link>
    <description>Job-work clearances returned to the principal manufacturer were held to present a prima facie case against inclusion of the value of materials supplied under job-work challans. The appellants processed goods received from principal manufacturers, paid duty on the value addition, and returned the goods after carbon lining. As the goods were not sold to third parties, the job-work procedure was followed, and the Revenue did not dispute the nature of the activity, the cited Tribunal principle on Rule 10(a) was applied to hold that it did not govern such a job worker. Waiver of predeposit and stay of recovery were therefore granted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2015 10:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=389743" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (7) TMI 305 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261344</link>
      <description>Job-work clearances returned to the principal manufacturer were held to present a prima facie case against inclusion of the value of materials supplied under job-work challans. The appellants processed goods received from principal manufacturers, paid duty on the value addition, and returned the goods after carbon lining. As the goods were not sold to third parties, the job-work procedure was followed, and the Revenue did not dispute the nature of the activity, the cited Tribunal principle on Rule 10(a) was applied to hold that it did not govern such a job worker. Waiver of predeposit and stay of recovery were therefore granted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261344</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>