Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2015 (7) TMI 86 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal allows deductions for bad debts, investments, and provisions under Income Tax Act The Revenue's appeal was partly allowed, with the Tribunal upholding the Assessee's claim for deductions under various sections of the Income Tax Act. The ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Tribunal allows deductions for bad debts, investments, and provisions under Income Tax Act

                          The Revenue's appeal was partly allowed, with the Tribunal upholding the Assessee's claim for deductions under various sections of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal allowed deductions for bad debts written off, depreciation on investments held under the "Held to Maturity" category, and certain provisions, while disallowing penalty deductions. The Tribunal also clarified the applicability of certain sections to banking companies and directed a re-examination of deductions based on profits derived from eligible business.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Deduction under Section 36(1)(viia) of the Income Tax Act.
                          2. Deduction under Section 36(1)(vii) of the Income Tax Act.
                          3. Depreciation on investments held under "Held to Maturity" (HTM) category.
                          4. Disallowance of penalty as deduction.
                          5. Applicability of Section 115JB to banking companies.
                          6. Computation of disallowance under Section 14A of the Income Tax Act.
                          7. Deduction under Section 36(1)(viii) of the Income Tax Act.

                          Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

                          1. Deduction under Section 36(1)(viia):
                          The Revenue challenged the CIT(A)'s decision allowing the Assessee's claim for deduction under Section 36(1)(viia) for Rs. 192,57,72,764, arguing it exceeded the provisions made in the accounts. The Tribunal followed the decision in Canara Bank's case, holding that the claim for deduction under Section 36(1)(viia) cannot be greater than the amount debited to the profit and loss account as provision. The Assessee's alternate plea to consider the total provision for bad and doubtful debts (PBDD) created in the books, including non-rural advances, was accepted, allowing a deduction of Rs. 100,55,67,213.

                          2. Deduction under Section 36(1)(vii):
                          The Assessee claimed a deduction of Rs. 108,53,62,763 for bad debts written off, which the AO disallowed, arguing the credit balance in the PBDD for non-rural branches should be adjusted. The Tribunal, following the Supreme Court's decision in Catholic Syrian Bank, held that deductions under Sections 36(1)(vii) and 36(1)(viia) are independent, and the proviso to Section 36(1)(vii) applies only to rural advances. Thus, the Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision to allow the deduction.

                          3. Depreciation on Investments (HTM):
                          The AO disallowed the Assessee's claim for depreciation on investments held under HTM, following RBI's Master Circular. The Tribunal, following its own and the Karnataka High Court's decisions in similar cases, upheld the CIT(A)'s decision allowing the deduction, treating such investments as stock-in-trade.

                          4. Disallowance of Penalty:
                          The AO disallowed Rs. 90,94,829 paid as penalty, considering it for infraction of law. The Tribunal, following the Karnataka High Court's decision in Syndicate Bank, held that such penalty is not allowable as a deduction, reversing the CIT(A)'s order.

                          5. Applicability of Section 115JB:
                          The Tribunal held that the provisions of Section 115JB do not apply to banking companies, following its decision in Syndicate Bank and other similar cases. Consequently, the computation of book profits under Section 115JB by the AO was not sustained.

                          6. Computation of Disallowance under Section 14A:
                          The AO invoked Rule 8D to disallow Rs. 2.14 crores as expenditure related to exempt income. The Tribunal, considering the Karnataka High Court's decision in CCI Ltd., held that no disallowance under Section 14A is warranted as the Assessee's expenditure would have been incurred irrespective of earning tax-free income.

                          7. Deduction under Section 36(1)(viii):
                          The AO and CIT(A) rejected the Assessee's claim for deduction under Section 36(1)(viii), considering the entity's overall loss. The Tribunal held that the deduction should be computed based on profits derived from eligible business, not the entity's overall profits. The AO was directed to re-examine the computation provided by the Assessee.

                          Conclusion:
                          The appeal by the Revenue was partly allowed, while the appeal by the Assessee was allowed, with specific directions to re-examine certain computations and deductions.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found