Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2015 (4) TMI 919 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Appeal partially allowed with remittance for fresh consideration; exclusion of communication charges from export turnover upheld. The assessee's appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes, with several issues remitted back to the AO/TPO for fresh consideration. The ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Appeal partially allowed with remittance for fresh consideration; exclusion of communication charges from export turnover upheld.

                          The assessee's appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes, with several issues remitted back to the AO/TPO for fresh consideration. The department's appeal was dismissed, upholding the DRP's direction on the exclusion of communication charges from export turnover for Section 10A deduction.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Transfer Pricing Adjustments
                          2. Selection of Comparables
                          3. Deferred Revenue Expenditure
                          4. Employee Cost Adjustment
                          5. Risk and Working Capital Adjustments
                          6. Exclusion of Communication Charges from Export Turnover for Section 10A Deduction

                          Detailed Analysis:

                          1. Transfer Pricing Adjustments:
                          The appeals pertain to the assessment year (AY) 2009-10, involving the determination of the arm's length price (ALP) for international transactions between the assessee, an Indian subsidiary of Planet Soft Inc., USA, and its Associated Enterprises (AE). The Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) accepted the Transaction Net Margin Method (TNMM) but rejected the assessee's Transfer Pricing (TP) report, citing defects such as the use of multiple year data and inappropriate filters. The TPO selected 17 comparables, resulting in a TP adjustment of Rs. 6,88,46,979.

                          2. Selection of Comparables:
                          The assessee objected to the selection of certain comparables by the TPO. The ITAT examined each comparable and provided detailed reasons for exclusion or inclusion:
                          - Bodhtree Consulting Ltd.: Excluded as it is engaged in software products.
                          - Infosys Ltd.: Excluded due to functional dissimilarity and ownership of significant intangibles.
                          - KALS Information Systems Ltd.: Excluded for being functionally different.
                          - Tata Elxsi Ltd.: Excluded for functional dissimilarity and lack of segment revenue.
                          - Persistent Systems Pvt. Ltd.: Excluded due to engagement in product development and lack of segmental data.
                          - R Systems International Ltd.: Excluded for having a different financial year ending.
                          - Thinksoft Global Services Ltd.: Excluded for providing testing services, not software development.
                          - Thirdware Solutions Ltd.: Excluded due to involvement in product development and lack of segmental expenditure details.
                          - Igate Global Solutions Ltd.: Remitted for fresh examination due to high turnover and potential product development.
                          - Zylog Systems Ltd.: Excluded due to acquisitions affecting revenue.
                          - Sasken Communication Technologies Ltd.: Remitted for fresh adjudication due to involvement in product development and lack of segmental cost details.

                          3. Deferred Revenue Expenditure:
                          The assessee claimed that amortization of deferred revenue expenditure should not be considered operational. The TPO and DRP rejected this claim. The ITAT remitted the issue back to the AO/TPO for fresh examination, directing the assessee to demonstrate that such expenditure was not claimed in preceding years.

                          4. Employee Cost Adjustment:
                          The assessee argued for the exclusion of excess employee costs from operating costs. The DRP rejected this claim, stating that maintaining excess staff is common practice. The ITAT remitted the issue back to the AO/TPO for re-examination, directing verification of the cause for the quantum jump in salary.

                          5. Risk and Working Capital Adjustments:
                          The TPO did not allow any risk adjustment, and made a negative working capital adjustment of (-)3.64%. The ITAT remitted the issue back to the AO/TPO for fresh consideration, directing the assessee to provide a scientific basis for risk adjustment and to examine the working capital adjustment.

                          6. Exclusion of Communication Charges from Export Turnover for Section 10A Deduction:
                          The DRP directed the AO to reduce communication charges from both export turnover and total turnover while computing the deduction under Section 10A. The ITAT upheld the DRP's direction, dismissing the department's appeal on this issue.

                          Conclusion:
                          - The assessee's appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes, with several issues remitted back to the AO/TPO for fresh consideration.
                          - The department's appeal was dismissed, upholding the DRP's direction on the exclusion of communication charges from export turnover for Section 10A deduction.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found