Appeal dismissed, leasehold right value included in net wealth under Finance Act. Property valued at Rs. 82 Lakhs upheld.

The appeal was dismissed, and the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was upheld. The Court ruled that the leasehold right in the property should be included in the net wealth under Section 40 of the Finance Act, 1983, and the valuation of the property at Rs. 82 Lakhs was deemed valid.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Whether the Tribunal is correct in concluding that the value of the leasehold right in the property was correctly included in the computation of net wealth as per Section 40 of the Finance Act, 1983Rs.
2. Whether the Tribunal is correct in concluding that the assessability of the said right in the property at Rs. 82 Lakhs in the computation of net wealth is valid even though rights in the property had vested with Central Bank of India in terms of the sub-lease agreementRs.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Inclusion of Leasehold Right in Net Wealth:
The primary issue is whether the leasehold right in the property should be included in the computation of net wealth under Section 40 of the Finance Act, 1983. The assessee had entered into a 99-year lease agreement and constructed a building on the leased land, which was then sub-leased to the Central Bank of India. The assessee argued that the leasehold right in the land and building should not be subject to wealth tax. However, the Tribunal concluded that a 99-year lease is equivalent to ownership and that leasehold rights are an interest in immovable property with value. The Tribunal further stated that receiving rental income implies constructive occupation by the assessee, thus including the leasehold right in the taxable wealth. The Court upheld this view, emphasizing that Section 40(3)(vi) specifies the inclusion of buildings or land appurtenant thereto in net wealth unless used for specific exempt purposes, none of which applied in this case. The Court referenced the Full Bench decision in Commissioner of Wealth Tax Vs Fagun Co. P. Ltd., which clarified that assets not falling within the specified exemptions are liable for wealth tax. Therefore, the first substantial question of law was answered against the assessee.

2. Valuation of the Property at Rs. 82 Lakhs:
The second issue concerns the valuation of the property at Rs. 82 Lakhs for wealth tax purposes, despite the sub-lease agreement with the Central Bank of India. The Tribunal had accepted the value of the building alone at Rs. 82 Lakhs, considering it reasonable. The Court noted that the Department only considered the building's value for net wealth computation, not the land's value. Since the Department did not challenge this valuation, the Court found the Tribunal's valuation just and proper. The second substantial question of law was also answered against the assessee, affirming the valuation adopted by the Tribunal.

Conclusion:
The appeal was dismissed, and the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was confirmed. The Court held that the leasehold right in the property is includible in the net wealth under Section 40 of the Finance Act, 1983, and the valuation of the property at Rs. 82 Lakhs was appropriate. There was no order as to costs.

---