<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (4) TMI 61 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258179</link>
    <description>The appeal was dismissed, and the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was upheld. The Court ruled that the leasehold right in the property should be included in the net wealth under Section 40 of the Finance Act, 1983, and the valuation of the property at Rs. 82 Lakhs was deemed valid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2015 16:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=380274" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (4) TMI 61 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258179</link>
      <description>The appeal was dismissed, and the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was upheld. The Court ruled that the leasehold right in the property should be included in the net wealth under Section 40 of the Finance Act, 1983, and the valuation of the property at Rs. 82 Lakhs was deemed valid.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258179</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>