Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the pending appeal under the Finance Act should be considered by the appellate authority and whether coercive proceedings could be kept in abeyance pending such consideration.
Analysis: The petition arose from rejection of a declaration under the Voluntary Compliance Encouragement Scheme and consequent coercive steps. The Court noted that an appeal had already been filed before the appellate authority and that the authority should first examine its maintainability as well as the merits of the challenge. In the circumstances, the Court found it appropriate to direct consideration of the appeal and to preserve the status quo by keeping the coercive proceedings in abeyance till then, without expressing any view on the merits.
Conclusion: The writ petition was not decided on merits and the petitioner was left to pursue the pending appeal before the appellate authority, with interim protection against coercive action.
Final Conclusion: The matter was disposed of by relegating the petitioner to the statutory appellate forum and granting temporary protection against recovery action pending that consideration.