TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>High Court rules impugned order appealable under Section 86 of Indian Finance Act, rejecting circular arguments.</h1> <h3>M/s Barnala Builders & Property Consultants, Versus The Deputy Commissioner of Central Excise & Service Tax, Dera Bassi Division, Dera Bassi and others.</h3> The High Court deemed the impugned order appealable under Section 86 of the Indian Finance Act, 1994, rejecting arguments based on a circular by the ... Maintanability of appeal - Appeal under 86 - Held that:- after incorporation of the Service Tax Voluntary Compliance Encouragement Scheme into the Finance Act, all other provisions of the Act except to the extent specifically excluded, apply to proceedings under the scheme - The impugned order passed by the Deputy Commissioner of Central Excise and Service Tax would necessarily be appealable under Section 86 of the Indian Finance Act, 1994 - writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file an appeal. In case, such an appeal is filed, it shall be considered and decided within a fortnight - Decided in favour of petitioner. Issues: Appealability of the impugned order under Section 86 of the Indian Finance Act, 1994; Validity of the circular issued by the Central Board of Excise and Customs; Applicability of the Service Tax Voluntary Compliance Encouragement Scheme to the Finance Act.Analysis:The High Court considered the appealability of the impugned order under Section 86 of the Indian Finance Act, 1994. The judges opined that the scheme under which the petitioner has applied is part of the Finance Act, making the impugned order appealable. The court rejected the argument based on a circular issued by the Central Board of Excise and Customs, emphasizing that all provisions of the Act apply to proceedings under the scheme unless specifically excluded. Consequently, the impugned order passed by the Deputy Commissioner of Central Excise and Service Tax was deemed appealable under Section 86 of the Finance Act.Regarding the validity of the circular issued by the Central Board of Excise and Customs, the court held that the instructions in the circular were not acceptable. The court highlighted that after the incorporation of the Service Tax Voluntary Compliance Encouragement Scheme into the Finance Act, all provisions of the Act, except those specifically excluded, are applicable to proceedings under the scheme. This decision reinforced the appealability of the impugned order under the Finance Act, disregarding the circular's instructions.Furthermore, the court addressed the applicability of the Service Tax Voluntary Compliance Encouragement Scheme to the Finance Act. The judges emphasized that all provisions of the Act, except those expressly excluded, apply to proceedings under the scheme. Consequently, the court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn, granting the petitioner liberty to file an appeal. If an appeal is filed, it must be decided within a fortnight, allowing the petitioner to raise all available pleas in accordance with the law.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
